In the Beginning:
Science and Genesis 1-11
Class Eight - Day 5, Starlight & Time, DNA
We’ve touched on dating methods and we’ll further discuss
that and the fossil record later, but how about the lights from the stars? PP
Do stars that are billions of light years away prove
that the universe is billions of years old?
So let’s address that stumbling block, where the Bible says the universe
is just thousands of years old, and yet we can see stars that are billions of
light-years away PP (Starlight and Time – 24 minutes).
What’s
important to remember from the DVD is this statement from the related book by
Humphries of the same name: PP
“The
mathematics of this new theory shows that while God makes the universe in six
days in the earth’s reference frame, the light has ample time in the
extra-terrestrial reference frame to travel the required distances.” And the mechanism for that is PP
the
large amount of gravity at the beginning of the universe. Watching the video one time is not going to
give most of us an understanding of what Humphries is postulating. But as lay people we really don’t need
to. We simply need to remember that all
scientific evidence rightly viewed will confirm Scripture and that any
scientific theory that appears to contradict Scripture is either flawed or
misunderstood or both!
Let’s
come back to earth. Genesis 1:20-25
states PP:
“Then God said, “Let the waters teem with
swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth and the open
expanse of the heavens.” And God created
the great sea monsters, and every living creature that moves, with which the
waters swarmed after their kind, and every winged bird after its kind; and God
saw that it was good. PP
And
God blessed them, saying, “Be fruitful and multiply, and fill the waters in the
seas, and let birds multiply on the earth.”
And there was evening and there was morning, a fifth day. Then God said, “Let the earth bring forth
living creatures after their kind:
cattle and creeping things and beasts of the earth after their kind”;
and it was so. PP
And
God made the beasts of the earth after their kind, and the cattle after their
kind, and everything that creeps on the ground after its kind; and God saw that
it was good.”
So
going back to our visual contrast PP
between
the Biblical and evolutionary creation stories, we see we have entered into day
6 of creation. Verses 20 through 22
cover that day, which describes the creation of everything in the sea and in
the air.
Let’s
revisit the creation of vegetation in verse 12 PP:
“And
the earth brought forth vegetation, plants yielding seed after their kind, and
trees bearing fruit, with seed in them, after their kind; and God saw that it
was good." Here God simply “brings
forth” the various kinds of vegetation from grass to fruit trees from what he
had already created. That activity on
day three is an important distinction from what is now happening in day
five. In between these acts is the
further preparation for life that occurs in day four, as we’ve seen, when God
said “let the be” lights, that is the sun and the moon, and the stars. These all came from what he had already
created in the beginning on day one.
Yet
verse 21 states PP:
“And
God created the great sea monsters, and every living creature that moves, with
which the waters swarmed after their kind, and every winged bird after its
kind; and God saw that it was good.” The
distinction is the word PP
“living”,
which is used here for the first time in the Bible. It is the Hebrew word PP
nephesh, which is elsewhere in scripture
translated “soul” or “breathes”, but when used for the first time here is
translated “life” as it relates to conscious animals. So while vegetation “lives’ in a sense, they
do not have a nephesh life. That is, they
do not have a consciousness. So here we
have the second act of creation PP
by
God, with the same word for created, bara, that He used in verse one : ”In the beginning God created…” We’ll address
His final act of creation in a later class.
So in verses 20 to 25 we have every living thing except man,
whether in the seas, in the air, or on the land, created. Those under the sea and in the air were
created on day five and those on the land were created on day six.
Here we again have a clear contradiction between the two
stories, with the Biblical story having every living creature being created in
less than 48 hours versus millions of years in the evolution creation
story. For example, we have evolution
stating, amazingly, that PP
birds
evolved from reptiles (dinosaurs), PP which evolved millions of years
earlier, whereas the Biblical account clearly has birds created on day five
before reptiles on day six. I say
amazingly because of the utter impossibility physically for a bird to have
evolved from a reptile. Birds fly and
dinosaurs don’t. Birds are warm blooded,
reptiles are cold blooded. We all know
what a dinosaur bone looks like, which is nothing like the bones of a bird,
which are very light weight and hollow, PP
and contain PPx2
an intricate bracing
structure within them that screams design.
Furthermore, for any reptile in-out lung with its bellows-like
arrangement PP
to change into a PP
flow-through bird lung by
small steps, while remaining functional throughout and providing a greater
advantage at each step, defies imagination.
Such very efficient lungs help birds to handle the energy demands of
flight, especially at high altitudes. A
bird will land after flying great distances without being winded, whereas
we, with bellows type lungs, are gasping
for air after a short run. Relative to
archaeopteryx, PPx2
for years it was, and by
some still is, claimed as a transitional link between dinosaurs and birds. One of the biggest dilemmas for those who
want to believe that dinosaurs evolved into birds is that the so-called
feathered dinosaurs found thus far are dated to be about 20 million years more
recent than Archaeopteryx. This is a problem for evolution because Archaeopteryx
is now generally recognized to be a true bird.
Some specimens of this bird are so perfectly fossilized that even the
microscopic detail of its feathers is clearly visible. So, having alleged
missing links of dinosaurs changing into birds when birds already exist doesn’t
help the case for evolution.
It’s important that we all
understand the following point emphasized by Pierre-Paul Grasse, Chair of
Evolution at the Sorbonne PP:
“Naturalists must remember
that the process of evolution is revealed only through fossil forms. A knowledge of paleontology is, therefore, a
prerequisite; only paleontology can provide them with the evidence and reveal
its course or mechanisms.” We’ll look
at that evidence, which is damning to the evolution theory, when we deal with
the results of the Great Flood in Genesis 7:21-24, which created those fossils.
I have mentioned previously
that evolutionists have no idea how life came from non-life. They simply accept it as a matter of
faith. Of course it happened as we are
here. Actually, to believe that takes
much greater faith than to believe that God did it. The following video clip clearly demonstrates
that PP.
This is the home-school
version of Unlocking the Mystery of Life, which breaks Unlocking into six 10
minute segments. I highly recommend
it. This particular segment includes information
not included in Unlocking. (Where
Does the Evidence Lead? – How Did Life Begin segment - ~ 10 minutes)
Beyond the origin of life,
evolution has other insurmountable obstacles in its path from goo to you via
the zoo. The evolution story presupposes
that the transition from the simplest life form to man can happen through
natural processes, yet that transition involves an astronomical increase in
information as well as natural selection acting on random mutations over eons
of time, which is contrary to the evidence.
In looking at that evidence we’ll start with PP
Darwin’s concern voiced in
Origin of Species: “If it could be
demonstrated that any complex organ existed which could not possibly have been
formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my theory would absolutely
break down.”
Darwin included a chapter
in Origin of Species on the difficulties with his hypothesis. He felt the fossil record presented the
greatest problem, but as significant a problem as that is as we shall see, this
comment is correct as what we are about to address, irreducible complexity, is
fatal to Neo-Darwinism.
To demonstrate irreducible
complexity we’ll use the bacterial flagellum PP.
What you are viewing here,
and on Unlocking the Mystery of Life if you viewed it, has been called
the most efficient motor in existence.
It is an accurate drawing of what is viewed PP
of
the flagellum when magnified 50,000 times via an electron microscope. It propels the bacteria by rotating at up to
100,000 revolutions a minute. It can
stop and reverse itself in ¼ of a turn!
The bacterial flagellum has 30-40 parts and could not function with
fewer parts. There is no Darwinian
explanation for irreducible complexity as its theory requires each interim step
to have functionality or natural selection would eliminate it. Yet the flagellar motor has no function
without all its parts. Darwin called the
cell the “simple cell” because in his time of minor magnification it looked
like a simple blob of protoplasm. Had
the tools scientists have today been available then, he would have written an
entirelydifferent book, perhaps titled The Wonder of God’s Creation! By the way, modern editions of Origin of
Species leave off its subtitle PP
– The Preservation of Favored Races in the
Struggle for Life. Why do you
suppose that is? While we won’t delve
into it in this class, Darwin’s theory is racist and was clearly embraced by
both Stalin and Hitler. To pursue this
further, see Ken Ham’s book
Darwin’s Plantation or view PP
Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, where in addition to documenting viewpoint
discrimination in academia, Stein touches on this subject.
Back to the flagellum; Dr.
Michael Behe of LeHigh University documented the flagellum in his powerful book
Darwin’s Black Box. I highly
recommend it. I recall several years ago
Mike made a presentation in the Tampa Bay area and subsequently visited the
biology department at USF. After
presenting his arguments to the biology staff there, their response was that
given enough time they would find the naturalist solution to this seemingly
insurmountable problem! Recall what I
said the trump card of the evolutionist is?
Time! Here you see it at
work. Mike responded PP
that while he publicly
documented the flagellum in his book, the scientific community had been aware
of it for 40 years, with zero articles providing such an explanation.
Yet if you read current
literature you will hear that scientists have in fact discovered a naturalistic
answer to irreducible complexity and that the bacterial flagellum is not
irreducibly complex after all. That’s
because it evolved from PP
the type three secretory
system in a process called co-option.
The TTSS is a bad dude, being the injector used by the plague virus to
spread that horrible disease.
Evolutionists say the flagellum co-opted the TTSS, adding parts to
become what it now is. That’s simply
another “just so” story that the evolutionists throw out to cover up difficult
problems with their theory. First of
all, even if it was true, which it isn’t, it doesn’t explain the numerous
transitional phases between the TTSS and the flagellum which would not be
functional and therefore would be selected out by natural selection. Secondly, research demonstrates that the TTSS
is in fact a mutation of the flagellum, not the other way around.
Let’s quickly look PP
at the cell that Darwin
called simple. It is anything but
simple. Evolutionist Bruce Alberts, then
president of the National Academy of Sciences, said this PP
about the cell in
1988: “The entire cell can be viewed as
a factory that contains an elaborate network of interlocking assembly lines,
each of which is composed of large protein machines.”
Your body is comprised of PP
100 trillion of these
complex cells! And relative to the
“protein machines” Alberts refers to, each of those cells has PP
about 60,000 proteins in
it. Isn’t it interesting that the
evolutionists deny design in biology yet use design terms and engineering
knowledge is often required in their research!
Proteins are called the
building blocks of life, and Unlocking the Mystery of Life does an excellent
job of explaining how DNA is transcribed into messenger RNA which links
together amino acids in just the right order to form the needed protein, which
is then escorted to where it is needed in the cell. PP
There is no scientific
evidence for any process in nature that can arrange letters in a precise
sequence, yet PP
humans can do it easily.
Proteins PP
are like sentences. They are made up of
dozens of precisely ordered
letters–“chemical letters” called “amino acids.” So the amino acids I referred to could be
thought of as letters in an alphabet, but the words they form are much more
complex than any of our largest words.
Proteins PP
can be thought of as
macro-words. We think of macro-words
such PP
as
antidisestablishmentarianism or PP
supercalifragilisticexpialidocious,
but they are small when compared to the smallest proteins, which contain at
least 150 letters. So we see that PP
DNA is an
information-packed library and PP it is also a
“macromolecule.” And, PP as an
“informational macromolecule,” it carries the blueprints for proteins. And so PP
our message in the sand of
“John loves Mary” is only 15 letters but an intelligent agent is obvious. PP Yet
bacterial DNA contains 2,000,000 letters and PP human DNA contains
3,000,000,000 letters! So, PP Darwin’s
paradigm springs a huge leak: it can’t explain the origin of information.
Yet
Bill Gates of Microsoft fame PP
has stated: “Human DNA is like a computer program but
far, far more advanced than any we’ve ever created.” DNA is the abbreviation
for PP
Deoxyribonucleic Acid, but
just remember Definitely No Accident.
DNA has amazing information storage capability. For example, the amount of DNA that can be
held on the head of a needle contains the informational PP
equivalent of a stack of
books reaching from the earth to the moon 240 times! Recall that the moon is 214,000 miles from
the earth. Converting those books into
CDs PP
would result in a stack of
CDs 68 miles high. Francis Crick, the
co-discoverer of the structure of DNA, while never admitting it publicly told
his son PP
in a letter that DNA
was like a code! We’ll see the
implications of that shortly.